Brigitte Macron finds her name implicated in a court decision following a fraudulent modification of tax data: on appeal, a couple was sentenced to suspended sentences for this manipulation. Here you will discover the precise facts, key dates, and the verdict rendered by the cour d’appel of Paris.
In brief: in spring 2024, Laurent A., 42 years old, and Juliette A., 48 years old, registered several personalities — including the First Lady — in their tax declaration, causing an automatic correction in the DGFIP database. The complaint filed in September 2024 led to an acquittal in February 2025, followed by a conviction on appeal in May 2026.
Appeal conviction: suspended sentences confirmed for the couple
The justice, seized after Brigitte Macron’s complaint, overturned the initial judgment of the correctional court that had acquitted the defendants. The cour d’appel of Paris ultimately sentenced Juliette A. to four months of imprisonment with suspension and Laurent A. to three months with suspension, accompanied by a two-year disenfranchisement. The judgment justifies the repression of this documentary fraud, as reported by an article from Figaro.
The facts: an automatic modification with real consequences
In spring 2024, the couple had declared, in the section “other dependents with disabilities,” all members of the government and parliamentarians, as well as Ms. Macron under the identity “Mr. Trogneux Jean-Michel, also known as Brigitte”. This entry triggered an automatic correction in the DGFIP registry, later visible in the personal space of the First Lady, which was noted by her secretary. The details of the case were covered by a report from Corse-Matin, which recalls the precise timeline.
Procedure and legal context
During the first trial in February 2025, the court considered that “there had been no identity theft as there had been no attempt to access Ms. Macron’s personal space.” The appeal took a different qualification, considering that the fraudulent modification of data constituted a sufficient violation to justify a sanction. This judgment is part of a series of cases where the First Lady has been regularly targeted.
Harassment and public impact
Brigitte Macron denounced the impact of rumors targeting her identity and gender, explaining that these attacks had a “very strong impact” on her family and grandchildren. In January, several individuals had already been convicted for disseminating insults and rumors, indicating a broader phenomenon of cyber harassment. The judicial case surrounding the DGFIP fits within this context of increased protection for public figures.
To learn more about Sébastien Auzière and the Macron family, discover comprehensive files and archives at sebastien-auziere.fr, which provides detailed insights into family backgrounds and public issues.
